• Home
    • About
  • Johannes Page
  • Johannes Speaks
  • Johannes Writes
    • Color and Composition
  • Poetry Home
    • Earth's Creatures
    • Straw to Lay a Child
    • Meet Me at the Passage
  • Family Page
  von Gumppenberg

Johannes Writes

The Likeness of a Beautiful Thing - 11

6/3/2016

0 Comments

 
The FINAL week --
     with summary conclusions for "What is a beautiful thing?" and "Why pursue beauty?" and the meaning of true fulfillment for our leisure time.
Picture
   F.   The Definition – What is a Beautiful Thing?

        Just as a thing is interesting when it engages the participation of the intellect, so is beauty its ability to engage us through the senses which, in our present line of interest, is the sense of sight.

        If we have reached agreement on my live demonstrations, two things will have been made clear.
  1. First, we all perceive the music and the screeching the same way once the locations that require action are identified and mended, or you could not have conceded that I had improved anything at all.
  2. Second, to ascertain the sites where correction will be needed is a skill which grows more powerful with practice and experience. It was therefore easier for me to do than it could possibly have been for a layman without training.
           The true action of this skill is to observe our own responses as we behold a visual
            display. It is the ability to look at ourselves while looking at a thing.



   G.   The Purpose – Why Do We Pursue It?

        If we ask what makes a beautiful thing desirable to have, we get invariably the reply: “It pleases.” So it often does, but decidedly not always: 

  1. Matthias Grűnewald’s Isenheim Aaltar Crucifixion is a very embodiment of suffering.
  2. And Pucchini’s opera Madama Butterfly ends in tragedy and terrible despair.
  3. Against the backdrop of Germany’s declining fortunes of battle and her shattered cities near the end of World War II, the narrator in Thomas Mann’s great novel Doctor Faustus looks upon the parallel devastation of the broken sanity and approaching death of his lifelong friend, the composer Adrian Leverkühn.
  • He relates to us how he felt like one of the condemned souls in Michelangelo’s Last Judgment whom a pair of daemons wrenches downward into the abyss. The figure covers but a single eye while glaring insanely through the other, as though he could not endure and bear to look upon this hell he was nonetheless compelled to see.
  • The narrator ends these broodings with a prayer of a single sentence:  “May God have mercy upon both your souls – my friend, my fatherland!”
  
             Literature, of all the arts, uses the comprehending intellect as if it were one of our
            senses. For, the reading eye alone would see page by weary page a single basic
            pattern endlessly repeated. But form and composition speak at first to the brain
             itself as if it were purely an organ of reception – a retina and eardrum of the mind.
 

        What unfolds in all my three examples are terrifying tragedies. To be gratified or well-pleased with them would be indeed satanic pleasure – a diabolical amusement. But, even while the heart is saddened, these works can so utterly engage all our mind and feeling that no foreign desires are able to intrude, and no distractions tarnish, the experience. Thus we learn through them a perfection of fulfillment.
  1. We can otherwise have a perfection of experience without necessarily beholding a perfect work of art.
  • We are capable of giving this fulfilling beneficence to ourselves from something merely good enough to stimulate us to the mental labor of perfecting inwardly what may inherently be flawed. To do this is to make one’s reception better.
  • Pictorial composition may deliberately use incompleteness to achieve perfection. We can mentally complete my sphere and cube in the following illustration, though I have rendered them in fragments only.   
  • Experiencing perfection without a perfect work of art also can be base and, at its worst, extremely ugly. Cheap entertainment or cheap reading and, most of all, the deadly plague of psychoactive drugs, furnish a perfection of downward self-fulfillment. While these pleasures last, they constitute perfection for the user, because he is incapable of any wider purposes or wishes.
Picture
The Purpose – Why Pursue Beauty?   (cont’d)  
 
        2.  But to love and learn about the Arts we have to measure up to them. We have
              the right to assess any work against the artist’s claim – his promise, if you will –
              that he is showing it to us because it will be a first rate thing to see. Yet, as viewers
              we must have good will, seek to un-learn our prejudices, and shed the common
              failing of ill-tempered and pedantic carping. For these will surely shut the doors
              on art.

        Besides good will, and by the instrument and reason of good will, we have to learn to open our eyes and to develop a clear mind, to be –  to the best of our ability –  a Noble Viewer for the artist’s work.
  1. The Noble Viewer of measureless good will, keen intellect, and clarity of vision, plays his role as an artist’s ideal in the Platonic sense. He may grow to be more real than any living person, because he represents the granting of an ardent wish, as the human being with whom most of all an artist wants to share the best of all his work.
  2. And no actual person may quite equal the hope and the reliable assurance the Noble Viewer can thus carry into the domain of art, who may be quite severely critical, but never uncharitably so. The Noble Viewer is in that sense a reality that we assemble him from real people – not from a single person, but from the best qualities of several.
  3. To attain – even imperfectly—the attributes of our Noble Viewer demands self-control and study, that is, self-expenditure. And gaining so much ground is truly an enrichment. The pursuit of art is always upward self-fulfillment, because it is invariably accompanied by self-enrichment.

The Sciences – and here we must include Philosophy among them – are also fulfilling and enriching. But the Fine Arts and the Sciences cannot take one another’s place.
  1. For science when it does not treat reality becomes a kind of science fiction, and Philosophy in this case, an unavailing speculation and subjective brooding.
  2. All the Sciences – to do their proper work – must face man’s needs and problems squarely, as must also the designer of any object of utility, however beautifully made, if his product shall be useful as well as good to see.

The Arts, however, can transport us to another world where our daily troubles matter little, and where we are refreshed as if we went on a vacation.
  1. My painting was able to surpass the actual coffee pot, which cannot surpass itself, and so could not accomplish what the picture did.
  2. Other pictures articulated images of fantasy and rendered my personal responses to literature and life, while my table easel, for example, must interpretively remain mute and forever a mere tool.
  3. My action of setting down the paper snippets showed that a beautiful thing in art is a work capable of engaging fully our sensibilities.
            We consider it worth creating and worth having – not so much because it pleases –
             but because it simultaneously enriches and fulfills and restores our weary spirit,
             in a compact – one almost wants to say “efficient” – form that nothing else can
             quite achieve.

      4.   Finally, works of art can give to us this true refreshment and unburdening from
             our common cares in ways no artifact can altogether equal.



   H.   A Change of Pace Rather than Escape 
  1. A journey into the world of art is not an escape from reality in the sense of flight, any more than an outing to the Susquehanna means an escape from Lancaster. We want what art can give. And without art – its enriching and restoring powers – the world would be a hellish place.
            We have seen that ugly objects – however functional – can distract the user and
            weaken him in the execution of his tasks. We assume therefore that ugly
            surroundings damage man’s ability to perform his proper work in life. Yet the
            unimaginable hell of a world entirely devoid of art – despite our inner city
            slums – still remains, I hope, mostly outside of human ken. But we are not prevented
            by our dependency on art from also wanting the truth of science and the reality in
            which it operates. We are not put to flight by reality.


      2.  The escapes of mindless thrills and pleasures cannot provide this change of pace
            we need for our restoration. For, largely disengaged intellects and sensibilities
            mean a relaxation of no pace at all.
The mind-deadening effects of numerous
            television offerings – that is, the resulting sluggishness toward mental action –
            show that downward self-fulfillments as a class, far from giving us refreshment,
            put us beyond the reach of any restoration.


      3.  But the Arts demand of us a diligence and an attention that will bring us true
            enrichment instead of a mere land of dreams. For they alter solely the use we make
            of our faculties, and thus sharpen them into alertness, instead of rendering them
            numb.

            Leisure time is time which truly belongs to ourselves, and we should get from it
            all the benefits we may. The Arts are more suitable than almost any other instrument
            for gaining such a purpose. 
 
                                                                                                               Johannes H. von Gumppenberg
                                                                                                                Lancaster, PA October 24, 1995

Picture
0 Comments

The Likeness of a Beautiful Thing - 10

5/27/2016

0 Comments

 
THIS WEEK – 
        A short section finishes some of the detailed discussion, including pictorial composition, before next week’s FINAL summation.
Picture
D.   Composition

        The real work of surpassing the material world is done not through a preferred abstraction, which can vary, but by a discipline named severally “design,” “composition,” or “visual organization,” whose ground rules never vary.
        If the tasks of composition were always as badly carried out as they are poorly understood, we should suffer a scarcity of well-done work even greater than we now endure. But our burdens of misunderstanding are real, and work their share of damage.
        The study of visual composition is closely similar to learning Rhetoric in language. If Rhetoric is the study of how to say something persuasively, then Composition in a picture becomes the study of how to show it beautifully.
  1. To this purpose we select, alter, and reject visual parts by an aesthetic faculty included as a bonus attribute in our wider capacity for instinctive judgment that we own as a survival tool. This has not much to do with the careless prejudices we acquire of choosing blondes over brunettes or, some years ago, the fashionably favored “Ashley” for naming the daughters of this country.
  2. If a weight threatens to fall upon us from a height, we do not squander time to straighten some item of apparel, but leap away as quickly as we may. And there are animals as well as man who will retreat from evil smelling food in favor of more appetizing fare.
  3. My preferred example of how composition works differs from that final observation only in its specific parts, but is identical in principle and function:  If we played chamber music against the strident screeching of some mechanism, we should not stop the music in order to get better access to the screeching, but rather, silence the screeching because we want to hear the music.
           
              We should un-learn, as best we may, our socially acquired prejudices, but the
               instinctive operations of the aesthetic sense we have to study, observe, and seek
               to understand.

      4.  Tinkering with my demonstration pictures, I shall not try to establish balance.
             Already the impressionists learned by the snapshot photograph and the Japanese
             woodblock print that this may be a dubious rule. A double portrait may require
             balance. But, as we saw, the profile drawing of a head must prefer the character of
             facial features to the skull in back, and would suffer damage if a rule of balance
             were applied. 
  
              Nor shall I tell you that your eye will move from one point to another. Perceptual
              researchers can – with the assistance of a suitable appliance, show any scan path
              with precision. And it will not often match the claims of artists.

         5.  Rather, my examples try to demonstrate how the screeching may be silenced
               and the music played. But the music sounded here is visual, and the screechings
               are visual distractions, that is, demands for an attention not justified by any
               optical appeal.
   
               A distracting “noise” will not be nearly so interesting as it may be loud – but not
               “loud” necessarily. For whispering too can be an emphatic bother and distraction.
               My process of fitting and adjusting can – to some degree – be duplicated by
               sequential slide transparencies.

                But, for a most persuasive showing, it must be demonstrated live.



   E.   The Action of the Paper Snippets

Relationships differ from place to place. Thus, only within a given setting can we visually judge and mend what is too big by shrinking, too small by making larger, too bright by making duller, and too dull by causing it to shine. Also, what seems shapeless needs to become form-full, and what is vague – and therefore puzzling – be made clear.
  1. The gravity of all such faults and measure of their damage can be assessed by the extent of unprofitable notice they command, determining thereby the amount of mending needed in the opposite direction, with smaller errors being not so urgent.
  2. In art we aim for and adjust only that which shows, so that the management of emphasis, by showing weightily and showing lightly, becomes the signal skill of composition. An emphasis is here not solely made through visibility and contrast. But the small as well as large, the exceptionally vague or dull as well as the crystal-clear and bright, all can be emphatic.
  3. If there is accord among us that my live demonstration pictures have altered for the better, then my paper snippets have rendered them, step by careful step, more beautiful, by letting our visual participation be a little less impeded and more fully possible each time along the way. Thus I have gained, perhaps, some sounding of my music and silenced, in the end, the screeching.

Coherent unity, the desired outcome of this effort, means the best works are best because they have become themselves – that is, without distraction – the full embodiment of all their theme and striving.
Picture
Picture
0 Comments

The Likeness of a Beautiful Thing - 09

5/20/2016

0 Comments

 
    During the past several weeks, Johannes gave detailed descriptions of Basic Design courses. Here, after some final thoughts, the essay returns to philosophical topics - aesthetics.             (NINTH of eleven sections)
Picture
      I.   Basic Design within the Foundation Program

        Within the Foundation Program the two semesters of Basic Design are by themselves a compact summary of an artist’s purely visual work of form and color, as opposed to figure or landscape drawing. 

        Apart from the special mission of three-dimensional composing, the Surface Designs divide the language of their visual domains very carefully into the parts of art and gradually join them toward a plane of competence where the student will be no longer a beginner.

        To summarize the tasks of a two-semester Basic Design course:

        Basic Design I:
  • Shape arrangement compositions without color.
  • The optical behavior of colors and precision training in their use.
  • Color composition ending with incipient training in careful observation, but starting with no demands concerning shape 
        Basic Design II:
  • Freehand Construction of geometric solids.
  • Volume perception and delineation through geometric sections of the whole.
  • Composition of volume combinations to articulate spatial advancing and retreating in the action of describing.
    
  J.   Historical Study
      
     1.  Artists need a grounding in Art History to see how cultural excellence – due to causes
            that fundamentally can never vary – appears in every period and all kinds of places.


  • Technical knowledge is good – even indispensable – to have for themes involving the especial difficulties technical knowledge must be relied upon to master. Technical knowledge enlarges our range of action rather than improving upon the excellence of our action.

  • However, excellence in art essentially does not depend on technique, but rather on the just interpretation of a subject combined with genuine achievement in design. Art History does not equal composition as an essential study, but it does help us and is therefore good to have. Other times and other places had not the learning of the modern West and thus not quite its range, but had equal excellence.
 
     2.  Besides needing the History of Art to train their eyes at discerning other workers’ best
             creations – regardless of how unfamiliar may be the face they wear – artists want this study,
             as every man must want the history  of  his own kind, for the assuring companionship it offers.  


  • For all such learning reveals how others – very much like ourselves – have lived and what they did. 

  • In our calling we may thus share the triumphs and frustrations of our brother artists through the ages and so take our places in a greatly lengthened life made stronger by a little faith in ourselves and a hope we owe to their example. 

There is no time for me to treat in our framework any useful portion of the History of Art. But we can deal here with the major steps in the development of Western Writing, whose dual heights of excellence must substitute for the miraculous abundance of the history of art which, alas, at present, poses an unwieldy horn of plenty.



        1.  Our Alphabet is the lineal descendant of Phoenician characters, which are thought to go
             back to Egyptian pictographs, or to have been independently contrived in Phoenicia.
             Aleph the bull became Alpha and “A,” Beth – the house, Beta and “B,” Gimel – the camel,
             Gamma and “G,” so that our word “Alphabet” itself is of this North Semitic origin.

        2.  Pictographs are unevenly exact sound-alikes. A picture of a deer could do duty for
              addressing some we are fond of, as in “my dear” and, less precisely, a “gull” as in seagull
              might mean a “girl.” 

             When Aleph, Beth and Gimel turned into Hellenic Alpha, Beta, and Gamma, their names
             became mere pronunciation keys for the initial sound and the Phoenician meanings
             disappeared. Along the way the pictographs grew simpler and more geometric in design,
            and so became true letters.


       3.  Around 200 BC, ill-crafted linear letter skeletons, more of a Latin than of Greek
            appearance, assumed truly geometric character in the centered horizontal bar of “A”
            and the semi-circles of “C, D, S and R.”

 
              The geometric character since then has been preserved, but was modified correctively to
            give aesthetic satisfaction. These changes produced in A.D. 100 the Monumental
           Stone-Carved Roman Capital, with the thicks and thins, as well as serifs of our present day.


       4.  The monumental Roman Capital is the first of two lettering masterpieces we have in
           Western Europe.


  • It is, however, a letter suitable for carving but cumbersome to write. Only its thicks and thins – the results of preparatory writing with a chisel-form brush – endure, when the chisel-edged nib takes over throughout the whole development of our second alphabet, of the letters we call “small.”
  • The path was gradual, with beautiful pen-forms on the way. Letter shapes grew rounded, in part longer, and eventually slanted, for rapid writing by the pen. The end-product was the Chancery Hand of the High Renaissance, and marks the second crest of excellence in Western writing:
  • The whole alphabet went through the paces of my “M” and “F” skeletons, which mark the pathways followed by the pen, without thick and thin resulting from the width of the pen.
Picture
        5.  I am indebted here a second time to John Howard Benson – who was the greatest writing
             master this country ever had – for my brief history of lettering. In his understanding, Chancery
             Cursive is the finest possible compromise between the needs of the reading eye and our rapidly
             writing hand.

        6.  Should we venture, perhaps rashly, to design an alphabet of our own, we must consider this
              historic line in order to remain inside the bounds of legibility.
  • Yet there is, within those limits, much we can create with the thicks and thins, with clarifying and widened endings modeled by the serif, and with the curving strokes of the rapid, running hand.
  • The visual correction taught to us by Rome is simply the design of legible, well differentiated, and yet consistent, elements belonging to one family of forms. And, when we go our own way, we should seek to equal that especial excellence instead of copying the Roman shapes.
 
        If we paint and draw still lifes, landscapes, or the human face and figure and think that lettering can teach us nothing, then we are not true students of the arts we practice. For an excellence a little off-side of our personal striving allows us to dismiss for a while our own designs and can refresh our fatigued and clouded minds, thus crystallizing our judgment and brightening our vision.
        To perceive in other disciplines how he may improve within his own, characterizes the ardent student and true learner.
 
 

 
III   The Likeness of a Beautiful Thing

     A.  Two Questions
 

         You owe this portion of the series to a one-time student who wrote me letters with questions about art to which I replied in essay form. One exchange dealt with the theme: “Why do we make art?” Two questions reside within the one:
  1. First, what is a work of art? Or, better, what, in the realm of art, is a beautiful thing – as opposed to a beautiful face that is a gift of God?
  2. And second, what benefits can a beautiful thing supply that we should feel a powerful compulsion to make a place for it in life?

        Both of these are philosophical concerns, and a philosophic bent of mind will help us to consider them. But philosophic learning all alone cannot succeed, because the task requires also the experience of a working artist.
        Because of this, my discourse will not be exclusively a set of philosophical reflections, nor center only on artistic action. But, giving both their due, we may achieve right understanding and thus reveal most clearly what an artist will find proper and worthwhile to do.



     B.  The Meaning of the Term “Art”  

        Art is a strange word, not for what it means, but what it fails to mean.
  1. There are three closely related Latin verbs – “aptare, arctare, and artare.” All mean to join together, as does “articulate” in our tongue.
  2. In German, the word “Kunst” is also notable for what it does not mean. It derives from “können,” the German verb for “possibility” – to be able to, or “can.”
  3. If we extract meaning, as best we may, from the Latin and the German, a work of art will be a thing ably joined together. Neither the depth of feeling we experience nor that which we express through art are at all delineated by this definition.

           In the great puzzles of existence, groping in the dark may be common in Philosophy. But otherwise, so much groping in the dark is not altogether usual, because language strives for our understanding, and not to deepen the confusion. For example, “lawnmower” and “dishwasher” proclaim at once what these appliances are and the service they deliver.
         My task is to make as precisely clear what art is and it does for us, as the names lawnmower and dishwasher make clear the function of those objects. To make as clear, however, does not mean to state as briefly. On the contrary, I must, to some degree, become substantially long-winded.                   
 

 
    C.  The Claim Implied through Showing Art

  1. There is implied a declaration when works of art go on exhibit. The artist tells the viewer: “This is a beautiful and very valuable thing; and therefore I am sharing it with you. For it is something you truly ought to have.”
  2. From this claim follows a rule an artist breaks only at great cost. His work – for the purpose of being seen – must outstrip reality. A coffee pot, painted just as it appears, is less than the coffee pot we can also use as well as see. Thus, to be genuinely beautiful, a picture must surpass its subject.
  3. We often fail to reach such excellence when we make fervent emotional appeals.  Sweetly sensitive or pompously heroic striving – while design and form are weak – cannot justify the response of feeling they demand. It is this kind of sentimental and heroic overloading which produces what Germans have named “Kitsch” and Americans call “Corn.”
           But learning that a picture of a coffee pot may be worth painting, and worth seeing, can be a
           rich reward.
  1. In the Coffee Pot still life, my patterns based upon the play of light are a specialized abstraction. They are a chosen derivation from my scrutiny of nature, which informs me that all the world consists of fields of color whose tonal values I may reduce to black and white.
Picture
Picture
Comment:
   Has some other discipline offered you insight into the practice or appreciation of visual art?


0 Comments

The Likeness of a Beautiful Thing - 07

5/6/2016

0 Comments

 
Middle of Essay – Illustrated section on Basic Design,  3rd of 4 Segments
     The reader may consider the current long, illustrated section to be a digression. Johannes describes courses for Basic Design in the Visual Arts suitable for both art students and those in other fields of study.
     After these 4 Segments  the Essay returns to more general discussion of art education and art theory. Rather than omit this section, it is included as part of the original essay. 

Picture
        6.  Detail and Mass: 
              We grasp readily how spherical sections derived from the latitudes and longitudes
              of the globe render its form legibly and clearly. But any pattern may be altered to conform to any
              surfaces. For the most complex configurations do only three things against the perspective grids
              we can inscribe upon all forms:


  • The parts of shapes either parallel, incline, or curve against the grid. They are thus able to reveal how they function in the perspective situation of each form. The lines of grids can also intersect at various – indeed, unlimited – inclinations to each other, so that reasonable practicality and visual appeal determine shape as well as grid design.
Picture
        6.  Detail and Mass (cont’d)  

  • My overall repeated line descriptions gave me, after considerable struggle, a single way to draw all forms. But here—by a flash of   intuition – I strolled, almost at my ease, into an enabling insight for rendering all forms in all possible ways.
            
             Since the limits of a shape configuration are linear, suitable line elements – as my human profile
             shows – can render form as readily as solid areas. 

Picture
       6.  Detail and Mass (cont’d)    

  • Depth relationships can be expressed by merest hints, so that stress of visibility must rather fall upon the labors best able to reward the viewer.
Picture
        6.  Detail and Mass (cont’d)    

  • This task my Boulders at the Shore below tries to carry out at the change of elements where solid ground and sky strip meet in the considerable distance. The sharpened focus upon distant sights is also a function of the eye, as well as of the camera, and familiar to photographers. But a precise consistency of the descriptive weight with every point in space – as the earlier example of my Partly Failing Intuition showed, is nearly always an impossibility. 

  • It is not a law of light direction which rules description but the geometrically precise relationship between the parts and the whole – that is, between detail and mass. My demonstrations thus intend to pose a model or prototype of Basic Knowledge for the treatment of all objects at once massive and detailed – that is, literally everything we see. But it bears repeating here that the play of light – which we do not need for clear articulation – is an inexhaustibly rich source that we may draw upon as if it were an entire “spare imagination. 
Picture
Picture
0 Comments

The Likeness of a Beautiful Thing - 06

4/29/2016

0 Comments

 
Middle of Essay – Illustrated section on Basic Design,  2nd of 4 Segments
     The reader may consider the current long, illustrated section to be a digression. Johannes describes courses for Basic Design in the Visual Arts suitable for both art students and those in other fields of study.
     After these 4 Segments  the Essay returns to more general discussion of art education and art theory. Rather than omit this section, it is included as part of the original essay. 

Picture
      H.   Two-Dimensional Design, Second Term 

  1. Volume and Space Perception:  Progressive systematic learning was in the Renaissance brought to bear on every field of study, and sought to put man’s entire visible domain within the artist’s competence and reach. From that time, Western Art separated more decisively from foreign art traditions than these differ from each other.

             This once seamless continuity of learning may now be weakened, because Modern Art inclines more
              to celebrate that man is able to emote and feel instead of his ability to reason, know and understand.
             To emote and feel is no achievement – we may as well take pride in the possession of an alimentary 
              canal. What I feel may gradually grow apparent; but what you and I can learn and understand together
              is the reason for this program.

        2.  Abstraction: The self-understanding of Modern Art regards abstraction as its central innovation, but
              its grasp of what that really is seems very vague at best. For Modern Art has sought to tell us that
              Abstraction equals progressive Non-Representation, where the least recognizable equals the most
              abstract.


  • The visual arts have no monopoly upon abstraction, because abstraction illuminates with clarity very various endeavors. If I describe to you an outing with fine sights and many pleasures, I should focus on the highlights while deleting dull and trivial detail. Far from any aim of non-representation I should want to isolate the quintessence of the action and experience of my outing to show more plainly why it gave me joy.

  • Similarly, we can reduce to their essentials our visible surroundings and say the whole world is made up of areas of dark and light, or we may choose to see it wholly as abutting fields of color. For my aims in Basic  Design II, all the world is my source, once more, for the derivation which I call Abstraction. But here the work is technically more demanding than it was before.

        3.  The First Operation of Abstraction: A dog, a tree, a table and a stone differ sharply from each other
               but share a property of cubic magnitude. They each possess Height, Depth and Width – the attributes
               of Volume. Thus, Volume is a signal Derivation from the unwieldy visible abundance of the world
               and – here particularly the Abstraction of Dog, Tree, Table and Stone. 


  • To make this abstraction visible on the level page, a favorable angle of regard has to be selected. For, if a cube shows only a single face, we see a square and not a volume. But when we rotate or tilt the cube to offer more sides than just one – preferably in asymmetric combination – its three-dimensional character is made clear. 

  • My linear likenesses of Geometric Solids below, and the Human form shown in an earlier illustration, are literally an isolation of the sparse essentials of their three-dimensionality from all distractions and confusions that clutter our world.
Picture
        Abstraction (cont’d)   

        4.  The Second Operation of Abstraction: If you compare my outlined volumes to the picture below which my wife has named The Floating Cube, you discover the latter to be more complex and offered in a setting to strengthen the illusion of a solid body advancing from a depth of space. It is the terminal abstraction and completion of my task, derived – like all foregoing stages – from the Final Cause that posts the artist’s problem.


  • The Floating Cube was made to give the viewer cause to feel attracted to it. If I succeed, my augmented cube will be more beautiful than its outline predecessor, because we call a visible thing beautiful when it engages our participation through the sense of sight. We name it interesting when it engages our intellect and capacity for thought and, once more, we call it beautiful if – as music does –  it engages us through the sense of hearing.  

  • The Second Operation of Abstraction re-supplies, in orderly successive stages, the stark essentials – isolated by the first operation from all random clutter and distraction – with additions aiming to prepare them for the task of effective contact with the viewer and their role of being looked at with appreciation.
Picture
        5.  The Continuity of Surfaces: The experiment of my faulty intuition resulted in a final sphere illustrating an acoustic fancy in which voices of exactly regulated volume are calling to a blind man to let him hear the sphere he cannot see.  

  •  From there I learned that heavy strokes which never alter their direction, but whose changing weight creates strong contrasts at the identifying edges of solids – such as pyramids and cubes, are not suitable for articulating curvatures, but that these exact a more densely packed description of many finer strokes.

  • While keeping the gain of having learned to make edges visible through contrast, we may once more shift stroke-direction freely. With reduction of detail and much agile and inventive probing, we can delineate the human head and figure or a tree and every other class of form.

  • This study of continuous overall description – though valuable, is not indispensable. But from it follow consequences I regard as absolutely necessary learning.

  • The spaces where my description grows heavier and looks like shadowing need not be so considered, but can be simply seen as clues to the surface of a form. Shaded and illuminated areas have a precise geometric kinship to the surfaces they cover and are always geometric segments of the whole. It follows to suppose that geometric sections of our own design can give the same clear legibility as those that are the product of illumination. And here my intuition did not fail. With the sole exception of pits and elevations seen directly from above, light and shade may be dismissed as a descriptive tool. And what the First Semester of Design has taught about the art of arranging and composing shapes assumes now overmastering importance.
Picture
Picture
(Section on Basic Design Courses to be continued next week)
0 Comments

The Likeness of a Beautiful Thing - 05

4/22/2016

0 Comments

 
Middle of Essay – Illustrated section on Basic Design, divided into 4 Segments.            
     The reader may consider the next  long, illustrated section to be a digression. Johannes describes courses for Basic Design in the Visual Arts suitable for both art students and those in other fields of study.
     After these 4 Segments  the Essay returns to more general discussion of art education and art theory. Rather than omit this section, it is included as part of the original essay.

Picture
II    The Transmission of Knowledge   (cont'd)

F.   The Basic Designs

  1. Three-Dimensional Design is not sculpture, but teaches only the control of sculptural surfaces and the proper relationship between technical action and the materials chosen for the job. It teaches also that a great simplicity can be very beautiful – not because elaborate magnificence is to be disdained – but that a handsome thing can be had at a great deal less expense. In building my own furnishings, I have used this training in simplicity with profit. But I have never taught this demanding discipline of composition whose results must give satisfaction from all angles, and I therefore hold no views about which inclusions – in what order – provide the best instruction.  

  • Three-Dimensional Design makes possible the study of what materials want to do on account of what they are. Modern materials are a multitude that we cannot manage in a college course. But two or three simple, inexpensive ones ought to be observed very closely and precisely under the instrumental action of the student’s tool. 

  • This principle of responsiveness to the exactions and the possibilities of a material cannot be learned from a supermarket of material substances, each considered only briefly and as swiftly once again abandoned. But a small representative selection will serve the student well when, on day in the future, he seeks to impose his creative will on substances today unknown.
 
             But I have never taught this demanding discipline of composition whose results must give
              satisfaction from all angles, and I therefore hold no views about which inclusions – in what
              order – provide the best  instruction For Three-Dimensional Design.   



     2.    Two Dimensional Design:    

  • Art has committed, and will continue to commit, many stylish follies as wayward as spiked heels with pointed toes for ladies’ shoes – that must, in time, deform the foot – and as silly as the mini-skirt. The obsession with the whims of fashion has caused the truly pioneering revolution in the Modern Visual Arts to neglect its best achievement – and that may have cost us a great deal.

  • Very early in the modern movement it was recognized that a Line, a Shape, and a Field of Color have aesthetic merit in themselves and deserve to be subject of an artist’s effort and display. The study of what such autonomous pictorial elements have power to perform was never undertaken. Instead they were much used with little understanding, although at times with beautiful results. So entangled seemed each succeeding generation with the fashions of their day that the full potential of these acknowledged visual parts remains, to this day, largely unexplored, and their range unknown.

  • To mend that failing is a sternly structured task and, on that account, cannot likely have a welcome in modern education. But, in the intimate circle of this modest class, maybe we can try that venture.
 
  G.   Two-Dimensional Design, First Term

        A study with the aim of constituting the enabling fundament of all the labors of the colorist and draftsman is an ambitious plan. But Basic Design will either be of basic value to the wider tasks of art or else becomes a detour and superfluous delay. Yet our beginning will be unpretending and extremely simple.
        Two-Dimensional Design, First Term, is pursued with least expensive materials and tools, but is capable of covering the widest range of visual learning.


  1. Composition starts as shape arrangements in humble black and white, but the turn to color occurs quickly. Color compositions are first made by combining rectangular paper snippets of the most various size and color, and so eliminating the separate demands of joining complex shapes.
Picture
       2.  The Work in Color falls into Two Divisions:  

  • The smaller of the two is technical, and teaches the constituents of mixtures and exactitude in using them, as well as the surprising optical behavior of color combinations when placed side by side.

  • The most useful of the technical assignments is the Color Change, by which a single color may so alter its appearance against different ground that we must call it different names. The Color Change alerts the artist that the material pigment content is only a sham of facts in art, while its truth is what appears to the viewer.  

        3.  Similarly there are visual illusions by which straight lines seem to bend and parallels both to
              spread  and to converge. Thus, to correct unwanted optical effects, the work I show is always
              done freehand.  For even the boundaries of solid shapes are subject to this fooling of the eye.
              Both the color and the line visual effects follow a familiar rule:  If we eat a spoon of honey
              and then bite into an orange, in comparison with that sweet predecessor, the orange will
              taste sour as a lemon.



          4.  My second great teacher, Josef Albers, deserves mention here. From him stem the Color
                Change and other valuable color demonstrations, as well as one signal tenet of visual
                 expression, of which the following example will give you an idea – though its specific form
                 is mine:  “When you draw a profile portrait,” he might say, “give to me the person – not the
                 skull in back – but the identifying features to the front!” This means that off-theme emphasis
                 can be as damaging to pictures as it would be misleading in the spoken tongue. 


  • Composition is often taught by curious rules:  Supposedly there must be balance, focal points, but there must not be any signal element at the center. Or, it is said that the eye moves from here to there in an unending guesswork that could be settled by an electronic instrument capable of tracking down the scan path with precision. Artists proclaim they set up tensions, resulting chiefly in the destructive harm we call distraction. 

  • The failure of such precepts shows in their wide following without a product of very much distinguished art. We should be glad that not every artist practices this kind of thing – although he may like to say he does – or we should lack good work even more than we already do. 
 
  • My Pyramid below stresses by adjusted contrasts the characteristic rising edges, while diminishing the baseline margins. And so it articulates that showing visually closely parallels the lowering and rising volume of common human speech.
Picture
        4.  Composition rules (cont’d)

  • Albers’ insight proved of the greatest service. For I found a way to stretch its clarity into a basic compositional principle of just a little wider range. How this works cannot be shown to full effect with slides, and I shall therefore teach it to you live with “Paper Snippets,” before this series ends. 

     5.  My composition course is a melding of two minds,  Albers’ and mine.

  • Much of the work is done in colored paper, to furnish the most experience in the quickest time. 

  • But some problems are designed for paint, notably a task beginning with a splash and splatter party on large sheets. Out of all these messes, small areas are selected, enlarged, and re-composed. The student learns here careful observation, and starts to grasp his personal limits. For, when he is encouraged to devise any shapes and colors to his liking, he is not even capable of wanting – that is, imagining – the shape configurations he draws upon for this assignment. It is hoped that he will thereby first begin to value the vast visual abundance of the world that surrounds him on all sides as if it were a “spare imagination.” 

  • There are further problems in which the number of areas and colors is strictly limited; but the solution must give no impression of constraint, but only of an ample plenitude of color.  

  • In all such work, two classes of corrective action will be carried out. What seems out of order or fragmented is brought into a coherent unity that will not be of dull sameness, but of ever changing pace. Hence, what seems characterless and slack must be more sharply differentiated, as in the frame-by-frame progression of my demonstration page: Quick, short curves alternate with longer, slower ones, corners contribute angularity, while the thick and thin of line, as well as intervals and solid shapes appear.
Picture
        5.  More on Composition rules (cont’d)

            The viewer re-compounds the unity of a design by his own sustained attention to it. A
             coherence without character – that is, without each part contributing its own unmistakable
             identity – will suffer,  despite its blameless unity, a twofold damage of distraction. One will be
             the boredom of the viewer and the other, in any exhibition, the powerful attraction of
             competing better works. 

        Any person – perhaps not himself an artist but seeking practical experience to help him look at art with a sharper vision – might profit from this First Semester of Design. For its manageable, rather simple, technical demands recommend the course not only to beginners but also to the amateur and layman. But the reach of this course unfolds fully only in the second term.     

Picture

NOTE:
    
(Section on Basic Design Courses to be continued next week)

0 Comments

The Likeness of a Beautiful Thing - 02

4/1/2016

0 Comments

 
In the early 1990s this was given first as a speech to a class at the Lancaster County Art Association, and in briefer form afterwards on a couple of other occasions.
Some of the illustrations come from the text, others from references to physical works that Johannes brought with him, and one from live demonstration.                                                                                        (2nd of eleven sections)                                                                                                                 

Picture
           
G.   Perfection, Compromise and Wear
  1. Compromise: The perfection of an artifact is not bound by a single function but by several that are traded off against each other: A pitcher permits us to transport a liquid as a solid and ought also to dispense this liquid without spillage. Its interior should be easily accessible for cleaning and its handle so positioned and so shaped that its weight is manageable and its pouring inclination easily controlled.
  2. Wear: Even a thoroughly made thing composed of best materials is, in the end, reduced through use to its final material substances and then discarded by the owner. Wear – the deformation of an artifact through use – can be long delayed, but not entirely avoided. A favorable Pace of Wear goes with function and – as a good desired by the patron – is required for completion of the job.

H.   The Integrity and Wholeness of a Perfect Thing

        The constraints of compromise and wear are difficulties which we may dismiss once we have managed them as well as circumstance allows. But we can center ourselves so narrowly on practical utility that we are scarcely able to endure and live with our functional creations.

        Unsightliness – through irritating or distracting and thereby weakening the user – impairs the function of an object. Moreover, artifacts are not just with us when they do their work, but also at their idle periods. Thus, among their varied functions, that of giving satisfaction to the viewer who beholds them has to be included. An artifact is made completely – that is, wholly finished and in that sense perfect – when visual excellence and utility are joined.

        When a man-made thing thus embodies an optimal reply to each of the user’s sensible requirements, it will bear wholly the character of all that it is made to be. It will be itself. That is, within the constraints of its own integrity, it will be perfection, in quite a similar sense that geometric shapes also can be perfect. A circle, for example, will be perfect within the limits of its own identity, because it is unsurpassable in its character of circularity.


I.   The Excellence of Art


        Visual excellence is an attribute of all good art toward one especial function, namely, that of being seen. It is essential in both the applied as well as fine arts, and consists at least of two requirements.

  1. Proportion: The just relationship of visual parts is an expression of proportions resulting from the artist’s power to compose by using as a guide his own attentively observed involuntary attractions and repulsions. These are not intuitions, experimentally predicting possibilities, but instinctive reflex actions, such as those which cause us to withdraw from a foul or rotten smelling food but to surrender eagerly to the appealing smell of fresh-baked bread.
           Neither are they predilections in a sense of taste by which we may be fonder of peaches than
           of grapes and prefer blonde girls to brunettes.
          Just proportionality gives to us the unimpeded visual coherence of a thing and hence its ready
           legibility.      (This should be demonstrated live.)

      2.
Clarity:  However, clarity is an intrinsic property of the work itself and therefore no more
           dependent upon who can look at it with understanding than is the legibility of writing to be
           judged by those who do not know their letters. For clarity inheres in the exactitude of the
           artist’s reconstruction of his purpose in visible material form. Clarity brings illumination into
           our minds and is there loved by our understanding.
        Clarity does not mean an expression
           is directly understood but only that it is amenable to comprehension. However, since we
           mostly want to understand any subject we consider, we love lucidity for granting us what
           we desire.


J.   The Common Foundation

        The Basic Designs – both two and three dimensional – are a line of learning aimed at Visual Literacy pursued by students in every field of art but thereafter put to different uses. All able expression of visual literacy is valuable and deserves a place in art. But the different art disciplines do not, on that account, produce interchangeable results.

      1.  Pictorial Limitation:        
            I cannot put my pictures to work to pour coffee or bicycle myself downtown. But, equally, I
            cannot put the artifacts suitable for these two uses to the assignments that pictures may
            perform. 

       2.  P
ictorial Expression: 
  • A friend called my Little Steamer in Distress by the name of The Little Tug That Could, and thus read most precisely my intention of articulating tenacious pluckiness in the face of towering adversity. A whole drama of the elements unfolds within the limits of a private space:
Picture
       2.   Pictorial Expression (cont’d)  
  • Demons over Moby Dick takes up Melville’s many times repeated phrase “the demoniac fish.” My strange beings in the sky are thus the Demon Allies helping the Demoniac Fish in his demoniac work.
Picture
      2.   Pictorial Expression (cont’d)  
  • Winged Demon and Demonic Monolith are both malevolent and threatening. But the winged creature must find his victims and close his talons on them bodily, while the Demonic Monolith, his furnace eye flashing open in the late afternoon, will work an imponderable but far greater menace at long range.
Picture
Picture

              Pictorial interpretation of Literature, Fantasy and Life is beyond the reach of objects of
              utility, which are expressive chiefly of the use to which we put them, and closely limited
              therefore to an excellence of visual form and the material service desired by the patron,
              without profound interpretive intention.

 
       3.  Artifacts in Numbers:
              The potential of an artifact is thus exhausted only if we regard it by itself. A work of
              Architecture with various details – inside as well as out – and its assembly of artifacts for
              every sort of use, especially indoors, can, overall, be far more than the sum of all these
              parts. They can give an eloquent articulation of the owners’ habits, character and will.
              Whole human lives express themselves that way. The discipline of Archaeology, from just   
              such clues, endeavors to reconstruct entire cultures.


             Thus, artifacts in numbers – coherently selected and arrayed, achieve an expressive range
             that eludes them singly. For this breadth of creativity, apparently, was Architecture named
             “Queen of all the Arts” by Michelangelo.

        Artifacts can be as powerfully and as far expressive as products of the Fine Arts. But while the latter are able to achieve this purpose singly, artifacts themselves cannot.

        Yet, of the many times when a judgment of what will be better and what worse cannot be evaded, in this case we may let the question rest and strive to design better the objects of utility as well as nobler works of art. It is important only to thoroughly understand what each is all about.


K.   Two Definitions of Art
  1. Defining the Exactions of Making:  Art is a thing ably joined together by the imposition of ideas on suitable materials toward clearly stated aims of form and function. The second definition follows from the first, to tell us what form and function want to do.

       2.  Defining the Purpose of the Making:  Visual Art is a language for engaging the participation
             – not of our sense of hearing, but of sight – for sharing, by an apt assembly of the visual parts
             of color, form, and line, the artist’s intention, with our open eyes and receptive minds, so that
             we shall be enriched and, in the end, fulfilled.


Comment:
         You might describe an artifact which you own and love that is beautiful and expressive - a work of art in itself . . .

0 Comments

The Identity of Meaning - 01

2/15/2016

0 Comments

 
We begin this series with the early essay which gives its name to this column - written in 1959.          (First of six sections)
Picture

  The Need for Meaning
 

     In the course of a daily increasing span of life, events and concepts accumulate to reach gradually a degree of confused complication that becomes unmanageable in its ever waxing quantity. The will to search for a basic principle which endows with meaning the enterprise of life, and all that it entails on the human scale, is at once natural and inevitable.

     These pages intend to examine the condition of meaning, in the hope of excavating a foundation upon which we may think and act –  not perhaps with certainty but with, however, a resolution wholly unlike the uncommitted indecision that characterizes the waste of futility.


    
From the recognition that we are able to discern meaning in nothing which does not in some manner take effect upon us, we obtain a first indication of a feasible direction in which we may pursue our search.

     Thus we have some reason to at least suspect that the particular way in which one thing makes its impact upon another contains what meaning is to be found, not in either one, but in the relation of each to the other. Consequently, we quite reasonably arrive at units of meaning of variable complexity, which must seek escape from futility in borrowing a reason for their existence by relating to yet further units.

     In this process of continuing and enlarging relationships, the point is ultimately reached where this interpenetration of related meanings is contained in one vast system which comprises all available associations and which, now in its turn, must find a source which will contribute meaning. Such a contribution can no longer be contained within the natural world and would have to be the prerogative of an infinite, almighty, and divine existence.


     Meaning, however, on the level of divinity, is totally incomprehensible to the mind of man. And if this investigation is to continue at all, I must assume that meaning in the lives of human beings takes its place in the natural world and may be understood -- within this deliberate reduction to the measure of man –  by the natural powers at our disposal.

     If that assumption be a violation of the essential character of meaning, and if I possibly reduce something to my own scale which, in fact, bears no reduction at all, I would yet be forced to take upon myself the risk of committing such an error. For the realization that, without so risking, I should be deprived of my theme altogether, appears to justify that I confine the problem to humanly manageable proportions, because it does exist validly and perceivably in the earthbound environment of humanity.



Relative or Absolute? 

     As long as we look upon the substance of meaning as the result of the associations among all things, we find that these relationships will outdistance us to the point where human intelligence can simply not follow. It is hence necessary to at least make the attempt to discover meaning not in the indebtedness of one thing to the other, but in a more sovereign sense which I should like to name “meaning in the absolute.” – The expression “absolute” here is not an identification of divinity. Its intended interpretation is antonymous to the word “relative,” and therefore close to the Latin root “absolutus.”

     For, in spite of the fact that we have observed that experience with meaning tends to be limited to the effects that invade our lives from the outside, or more briefly, tends to be “meaning in the relative,” each of these sources of relating influences does have a character and quality particularly its own. Quite independent from any ties with its partner in relative meaning, it does have identity, and we shall have to ascertain whether this contains such significance in its own right that we obtain indeed meaning in an absolute sense.


Picture
0 Comments

    A Blog containing longer text selections from essays by Johannes, on art, philosophy, religion and the humanities, written during the course of a lifetime.

    Picture
    Artists are not art historians. People who write are not all learned scholars. This can lead to “repeat originality” on most rare occasions. When we briefly share a pathway of inquiry with others, we sometimes also must share the same results.

    RSS Feed

    Categories

    All
    Absolute Meaning
    Aesthetics
    Albers
    Art
    Art Education
    Audience
    Autonomy
    Basic Design
    Color Study
    Composition
    Compound Meaning
    Creativity
    Descriptive Geometry
    Design
    Discovery
    Drawing
    Essay: Identity - 01
    Essay: Identity - 02
    Essay: Identity - 03
    Essay: Identity - 04
    Essay: Identity - 05
    Essay: Identity - 06
    Essay: Identity Of Meaning
    Essay: Likeness Of A Beautiful Thing
    Fine Arts
    God
    Identity
    Illustration
    Intuition
    John-howard-benson
    Josef
    Meaning
    Philosophy
    Poetry
    Potential
    Principle
    Project-stages
    Relative-meaning
    Religion
    Rhode-island-school-of-design
    Risd
    The-identity-of-meaning
    Utility

    Archives

    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016


  • Home
    • About
  • Johannes Page
  • Johannes Speaks
  • Johannes Writes
    • Color and Composition
  • Poetry Home
    • Earth's Creatures
    • Straw to Lay a Child
    • Meet Me at the Passage
  • Family Page